Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 29 2022 11:59PM. >> We have added brief of the methods and results. Line 143 word interview should not be started with upper case. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. The dataset is uploaded is OSF. 1. The details on which food to add and which to remove were discussed and finalized in the workshop. Our staff consists of exceedingly capable professionals who are well-versed in each academic area. Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 30 2022 11:59PM. Some of the unhealthy foods are greatly loved such as instant noodles, samosas, cream donuts, soda drinks etc., and changing food habit is challenging. "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". >> Added to the manuscript. In addition, fruits were not considered appropriate to take during lunch. Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, et al. If not the authors should indicate there is no other studies identified that have used the same strategies as the current study. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters). It reinforced ownership and enhanced project sustainability. Its incredibly fantastic news in a roundabout sense. Lines 47: I am not sure increased trust in research and confidence with the researchers is a result or what can be inferred (or assumed) given the processes and outcomes. A major challenge was time availability of stakeholders as they were busy in their respective works. In addition, the unavailability of healthy options, including the lack of food supply from local market, the higher cost of healthy foods, individual food preferences and limited human resources in the cafeteria were identified as barriers for healthy eating [19]. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". >> Its flow is changed according to the suggestion provided. Participants highlighted that the changes to improve food quality will be well received positively because most of them are health professionals. Send us your manuscript paper for writing, and we will do this job for you! Publishers are exceedingly picky, and only a small percentage of manuscripts make it to publication. However, items such as confectionaries like cream donut, oily curry and meat, soda drinks, instant noodles etc. If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. Interactive workshops provided opportunity and mandate for the stakeholders to participate in decision making and strengthened the investigator-stakeholder relationship. We involved stakeholders in all three phases. These interviewees brought their perspectives on the decision making system, how it affected healthy food choices in the cafeteria and other administrative decisions regarding employees health. Dhulikhel Hospital is an independently owned, not-for-profit institution which was conceived and supported by the Dhulikhel community. I see some of the work mentioned in the manuscript has been published, for example the FDGs & in-depth interviews. The stakeholders had more interest in and experience with the health interventions and research. In future, we plan to evaluate the influence of stakeholders on the research project and assess the engagement and effectiveness through their perspective, as well as longer term outcomes on health decision making beyond the conduction of research. For example, is it health promotion/medical intervention effectiveness? Department of Public Health, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal, 2 Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. We conducted three iterative workshops with the representation of hospital administration, cafeteria managers, cafeteria staff, nutrition department, employee, and researchers. The authors should detail how stakeholders were involved in the interpretation of the results. [CDATA[// >> The Table 1 is converted to figure and shifted to methods section. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Or do you think this means that they had their weekly meeting yesterday (rumor has it that they have one on Tuesdays) but couldn't reach a decision? Westfall JM, Fagnan LJ, Handley M, Salsberg J, McGinnis P, Zittleman LK, et al. Those who deal with manuscript writing have a reputation for being a nervous bunch. -Line 88: Aim would be more appropriate than theme, -Sub-titles e.g., Phase 1 Formative study would be better be presented as Phase 1: Formative study. At the same time, do write a polite follow-up email to the journal requesting the current status of the manuscript. The levels of involvement range from consultation, to collaboration in bi-directional partnerships and to leading research projects [8]. The stakeholder engagement has contributed positively in our study from formative phase to execution phase. 2020. If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. -Lines 231-232: They suggested to add the healthy items which will demand less time and resources like adding the automated machines such as roti makers. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Our manuscript writing paper assistance is about working to any deadline given by the client in order to get the draft text back to the publishing editors as soon as possible. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. >> It is mentioned in under Engagement objectives heading. The doctor in the study team suggested to consider nurses duty roster and contact nurses immediately after completion of duty hours in the morning. The fourth group consisted of payers who were responsible for reimbursement of medical care, such as insurers. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Pay for the assistance securely, receive notification of successful payment, and get your Customer Area login information. were considered unhealthy food. The design of the study has been published elsewhere [14]. The reviewer had some minor revisions request (attached file). If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at gro.solp@gnillibrohtua. The cafeteria managers and cafeteria staffs emphasized the need for active involvement of the departments of finance and administration because these departments had major role deciding the menu and price of the food served in the cafeteria. An empirical analysis of 30 cases. >>The stakeholders provided their inputs in decision making. As a result, six months of control period was added before intervention was implemented to be able to compare outcome measures with and without the intervention. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? 7. Hope everybody's doing well. Investigators directly participated in the day-to-day implementation of the study while advisors provided suggestion and guidance when required [18]. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. -Although it was stated that results from qualitative work is under consideration for publication elsewhere, this section could benefit from including more specifics regarding questions asked during focus group sessions/in-depth interviews with stakeholders and/or qualitative supporting quotes from discussions, since these informed intervention. Consider it in this light. quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). The last part The stakeholders represented as co-investigators and advisors need to be rephrased for clarity. Each workshop was facilitated by DT, a co-investigator, and an employee, using a workshop schedule and discussion guideline. We conducted 9 in-depth interviews with purposively selected hospital employees including a finance manager, a cafeteria manager, an administrative manager and 6 cafeteria operators after receiving informed consent. We defined stakeholder as an individual or group affected by or who can influence the environmental intervention to promote healthy eating in the workplace. will also be available for a limited time. [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. I heard that a first editorial decision is likely to be made within a few days after submission. -Lines 135-137. The identified stakeholders were: customers or employees (patient and the public; purchasers); cafeteria managers, chef and staff (providers); hospital administration and finance department (payers; policy makers); human resource department (policy maker); cafeteria employee, bakery and rice mills (product maker); and research team members (principal investigators). [CDATA[// >> >> The result and methods for FGDs and in depth interviews are available in detailed in the paper below and it is now cited. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework, Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research, Involving service users in health and social care research. Gyawali P, Tamrakar D, Shrestha A, Shrestha H, Karmacharya S, Bhattarai S, et al. >> Investigator were those who directly participated in the day-to-day implementation of the study, compared to advisors who provided their suggestions and guidances when asked for. Any letter from a publisher is going to be opened right away and reviewed multiple times. When reporting the results of qualitative research, we suggest consulting the COREQ guidelines: http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/349. If theyll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Status change from "under review" to "decision in process" to "with editor" again.
Phineas And Ferb Google Slides Theme,
Auburn Middle School Teacher,
Ucsc Important Dates 22-23,
Manual For The State-trait Anxiety Inventory Pdf,
How To Build A Multi Tenant Saas Application,
The Requested Soap Action Failed,
Kyoto Weather September 2022,
Chelsea Vs Liverpool H2h Fussball,
Nagapattinam To Madgaon Train,
Mtm Stainless Steel Quick Disconnects,